The Congress Working Committee met in New Delhi on September 29 and demanded the resignations of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah. Its resolution also called for the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls to be suspended and for names it says were wrongly removed to be restored. These are opposition demands arising from its allegations about the voter-list process; the meeting did not establish electoral misconduct as a fact.
Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge accused the Election Commission of withholding information about roll changes and the conduct of elections. The party said reported objections by two election commissioners to changes in voter-registration procedures supported its concerns. The existence of internal disagreements has been acknowledged by the Commission, but the party’s broader claim of deliberate manipulation remains contested. This report does not treat disputed totals of deleted names as verified counts.
The Election Commission has said differences within the institution are a normal part of decision-making and that its actions were lawful. On September 26 it announced a review of voter-roll software by a committee including an independent technology expert, and said local officials would visit voters flagged for discrepancies rather than routinely requiring those voters to appear at government offices. Those steps are responses to concerns, not findings that the opposition’s allegations were proved.
The BJP has rejected the opposition’s accusations as baseless and accused it of trying to discredit a constitutional institution. Congress, meanwhile, said members of the INDIA opposition bloc would meet in Delhi on September 30 to decide whether to launch a nationwide campaign. That meeting and any campaign were plans at the September 29 reporting cutoff, not completed actions.
For voters, the central unresolved questions are whether eligible people were removed from rolls, whether they received adequate notice and an effective route to correct records, and what the announced review finds about the software and procedures. A party resolution cannot answer those questions on its own. The Commission’s review, any disclosed roll data and any court findings will be needed to assess the claims and remedies.