SFLC.in’s October 5 statement and IFF’s October 3 statement challenged the reported removal of BitChat from India’s App Store under a government blocking demand.

Visual story · 2/2
AI editorial illustration: symbolic context, not a photograph of the event.
AI editorial illustration: symbolic context, not a photograph of the event.
Original factual graphic. Dated reporting; allegations are not findings.
Original factual graphic. Dated reporting; allegations are not findings.

The application supports nearby messaging through Bluetooth mesh networks. The groups argued that restricting a communications tool requires transparent reasons and an opportunity to challenge the decision.

Original factual graphic. Dated reporting; allegations are not findings.
Original factual graphic. Dated reporting; allegations are not findings.

Their description of the blocking as unconstitutional is an advocacy position, not a court ruling. The reviewed material did not include the full blocking order or establish that the restriction had been withdrawn.